The lawsuit filed on Ruth's behalf by Tycko & Zavareei.Ī rebuttal and correction of the defamatory Editor's Note that is at the core of Ruth's complaint against The Atlantic. On this website, you’ll find two important documents: District Court for the District of Columbia. She is determined to hold the magazine accountable for its cruel and dehumanizing treatment of her and to receive the due process she is entitled to under the law. On January 7th, 2022, Ruth filed a complaint against The Atlantic in U.S. Ruth Shalit Barrett: Defendant: The Atlantic Monthly Group LLC, Donald Christopher Peck and ATLANTIC MONTHLY GROUP LLC: Case Number: 1:2022cv00049: Filed: January 7, 2022: Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia: Presiding Judge: Emmet G Sullivan: Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander: Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. Most consequentially, editors at the magazine prevented her from fulfilling her contractual obligation to shield an important confidential source-a duty that has traditionally been considered a core tenet of journalistic ethics. ![]() In its zeal to distance itself from her truthful, deeply reported article and appease a powerful media critic who, as one journalist observed, clearly "set out to dismantle the piece with the express purpose" of damaging Ruth, the Atlantic defamed Ruth and committed multiple contract and tort violations. ![]() On October 17, 2020, Ruth Shalit Barrett published a well-received investigative article in The Atlantic, “The Mad, Mad World of Niche Sports Among Ivy League-Obsessed Parents.” Two weeks later, bowing to pressure from a competitor outlet, the Atlantic retracted Ruth's piece in full and issued an inflammatory Editor's Note that denounced her as a disreputable journalist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |